Excerpt: Due to ill-advice or under a wrong impression that if a complaint is lodged under section 498-A IPC, the husband may come to terms, complaints are being lodged with the police. It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them. Andhra High Court Tahmeena Kaleem And … Continue reading It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them.
state vs irshad
Delhi District CourtState vs . 1. Irshad on 9 September, 2019 IN THE COURT OF SH. POORAN CHAND, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-02 (WEST) , DELHI. Sessions Case No. 56660/16 Assigned to Sessions on 03.11.2012 FIR No. 170/2012 Police Station Nihal Vihar Under Section 498A/306IPC. Charged Under Section 498-A/306 IPC State Vs. 1. Irshad s/o Mohd. Yasin … Continue reading state vs irshad
Whether This Case Involves A … vs Salim Musabhai Ghanchu & ors
Gujarat High Court Whether This Case Involves A ... vs Salim Musabhai Ghanchu & ors on 7 December, 2017 R/CR.A/378/1994 CAV JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 378 of 1994 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters … Continue reading Whether This Case Involves A … vs Salim Musabhai Ghanchu & ors
Ravindra Pyarelal Bidlan And … vs State Of Maharashtra
Bombay High Court Ravindra Pyarelal Bidlan And ... vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 February, 1993 Equivalent citations: 1993 CriLJ 3019, 1993 (1) MhLj 658 Bench: A Agarwal JUDGMENT 1. On 21st January, 1986 at about noon time Rukmini, the wife of accused No. 1, committed suicide by pouring kerosene on her person. The incident … Continue reading Ravindra Pyarelal Bidlan And … vs State Of Maharashtra
Sanjay Sthapak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh High Court Sanjay Sthapak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 January, 2020 Author: Jagdish Prasad Gupta 1 M.Cr.C No.10044/2019 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR (SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE J.P.GUPTA) M.Cr.C No.10044/2019 Sanjay Sthapak & 4 others Vs. State of M.P & another Shri Ashutosh Joshi, … Continue reading Sanjay Sthapak vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Cnr No. Dlnw01-011368-2017 vs Unknown
Excerpt:The contents of the complaint Ex PW3/3 of itself cannot become evidence even if he depose in the Court that that contents thereof were correct and was stated by him. If such position is accepted then in all criminal cases complainant may give his written complaint in detail to the police and then appear in … Continue reading Cnr No. Dlnw01-011368-2017 vs Unknown
Neelam Devi vs The State Of Jharkhand
Jharkhand High Court Neelam Devi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 10 May, 2019 Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 187 of 2006 ----------- [Against the judgment of conviction dated 02.02.2006 and order of sentence dated 04.02.2006, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur in Sessions Trial No. 335 of 1999.] ----------- Neelam Devi .... … Continue reading Neelam Devi vs The State Of Jharkhand
Mukesh vs State Of U.P
Allahabad High Court Mukesh vs State Of U.P. on 12 July, 2019 Bench: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AFR RESERVED JUDGMENT Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 5267 of 2018 Appellant :- Mukesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Bal Ram Gupta Counsel for … Continue reading Mukesh vs State Of U.P
State Of Maharashtra And Ors. vs Ravikant S. Patil
Excerpt: Supreme Court of India State Of Maharashtra And Ors. vs Ravikant S. Patil on 19 March, 1991 Equivalent citations: 1991 ACJ 888, 1991 (1) Crimes 810 SC, JT 1991 (5) SC 442, (1991) 99 PLR 690, 1991 (1) SCALE 486, (1991) 2 SCC 373, 1991 (2) UJ 188 SCAuthor: K J ReddyBench: S Pandian, … Continue reading State Of Maharashtra And Ors. vs Ravikant S. Patil
Anil kumar vs state of A.P
Excerpt: There is no record even shown from the police charge sheet by collecting from father of de facto complainant as to any so- called additional amount of Rs.4,30,000/- given out of his retirement benefits or 15 tulas of gold. It is crucial if at all to believe as to what were the retirement benefits … Continue reading Anil kumar vs state of A.P
Geeta Rani Kakkar & 2 Ors. vs Chandigarh Administration
National Consumer Disputes Redressal commission Geeta Rani Kakkar & 2 Ors. vs Chandigarh Administration & 2 ... on 1 February, 2017 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4377 OF 2012 (Against the Order dated 09/08/2012 in Appeal No. 195/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. GEETA RANI KAKKAR & … Continue reading Geeta Rani Kakkar & 2 Ors. vs Chandigarh Administration
