It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them.

Excerpt: Due to ill-advice or under a wrong impression that if a complaint is lodged under section 498-A IPC, the husband may come to terms, complaints are being lodged with the police. It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them. Andhra High Court Tahmeena Kaleem And … Continue reading It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them.

Ramesh Sitaldas Dalal And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr

Excerpt: No doubt the Investigating Officer is not required to go into the truthfulness or genuineness of the allegations in the FIR or the other material collected in course of the investigation. Yet, the Investigating Officer does not have unfettered discretion to brand an innocent person as an accused, to file chargesheet and send him … Continue reading Ramesh Sitaldas Dalal And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr

Ashok Shewakramani vs State Of Andhra Pradesh

Excerpt:it is apparent that the words "was in charge of" and "was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company" cannot be read disjunctively and the same ought be read conjunctively in view of use of the word "and" in between. Supreme Court of India Ashok Shewakramani vs State Of … Continue reading Ashok Shewakramani vs State Of Andhra Pradesh

Dipali Biswas . vs Nirmalendu Mukherjee

Supreme Court of India Dipali Biswas . vs Nirmalendu Mukherjee . on 5 October, 2021 Author: V. Ramasubramanian Bench: Hemant Gupta, V. Ramasubramanian REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4557 OF 2012 DIPALI BISWAS & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NIRMALENDU MUKHERJEE & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. Challenging … Continue reading Dipali Biswas . vs Nirmalendu Mukherjee

Rahul S Shah vs Jinendrakumar Gandhi

Excerpt: Struggling with execution of your decree, then please use this judgment for early disposal and much more. Supreme Court of India Rahul S Shah vs Jinendrakumar Gandhi on 22 April, 2021 Author: Hon'Ble The Justice Bench: Hon'Ble The Justice, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE … Continue reading Rahul S Shah vs Jinendrakumar Gandhi

Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam vs The State Of Bihar

Excerpt: Coming to the facts of this case, upon a perusal of the contents of the FIR dated 01.04.19, it is revealed that general allegations are levelled against the Appellants. The complainant alleged that ‘all accused harassed her mentally and threatened her of terminating her pregnancy’. Furthermore, no specific and distinct allegations have been made … Continue reading Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam vs The State Of Bihar

K. Suryanarayana, A2 vs N. Jyothi

Telangana High Court K. Suryanarayana, A2 vs N. Jyothi on 17 March, 2022 Bench: G.Radha Rani THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI CRIMINAL PETITION No.13371 of 2016 ORDER: This petition is filed by the petitioners-A2 to A4 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in CC No.5 of 2016 on the file of XIV Metropolitan … Continue reading K. Suryanarayana, A2 vs N. Jyothi

CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1065 of 2000PETITIONER:Chairman, M.P. Electricity Board and OrsRESPONDENT:Shiv Narayan and Anr.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/08/2005BENCH:ARIJIT PASAYAT & H. K. SEMAJUDGMENT:J U D G M E N TARIJIT PASAYAT, J.An interesting question is raised in this appeal i.e.whether the legal profession is a commercial activity or isit a trade or business. The Madhya Pradesh … Continue reading

B. Mohan Krishna vs Union Of India And Ors. on 27 January, 1995

Andhra High Court B. Mohan Krishna vs Union Of India And Ors. on 27 January, 1995 Equivalent citations: 1995 (1) ALT 468, 1995 (1) ALT Cri 332, 1996 86 CompCas 487 AP, 1996 CriLJ 636 Author: M Rao Bench: M Rao, S Maruthi JUDGMENT M.N. Rao, J. 1. The provisions of Chapter XVII of the … Continue reading B. Mohan Krishna vs Union Of India And Ors. on 27 January, 1995

M/S Mesh Trans Gears Pvt. Ltd. vs Dr.R. Parvathreddy

Karnataka High Court M/S Mesh Trans Gears Pvt. Ltd. vs Dr.R. Parvathreddy S/O. ... on 22 March, 2013 Author: Anand Byrareddy 1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2013 BEFORE: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8943 OF 2010 BETWEEN: M/s. Mesh Trans … Continue reading M/S Mesh Trans Gears Pvt. Ltd. vs Dr.R. Parvathreddy

Nepc Micon Limited And Others vs Magma Leasing Limited

Excerpt: Section 138 of the Act has created a contractual breach as an offence and the legislative purpose is to promote efficacy of banking and of ensuring that in commercial or contractual transactions cheques are not dishonoured and credibility in transacting business through cheques is maintained. Supreme Court of India Nepc Micon Limited And Others vs … Continue reading Nepc Micon Limited And Others vs Magma Leasing Limited