Supreme Court of India Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 December, 2010 Author: D Bhandari Bench: Dalveer Bhandari, K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2271 2010. (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7615 of 2009) Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre .....Appellant Versus State … Continue reading Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors
Ankit Bharti vs State Of U.P. And Another
Excerpt: Section 438 Cr.P.C. on its plain terms does not mandate or require a party to first approach the Sessions Court before applying to the High Court for grant of anticipatory bail. The provision as it stands does not require an individual first being relegated to the Court of Sessions before being granted the right of … Continue reading Ankit Bharti vs State Of U.P. And Another
It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them.
Excerpt: Due to ill-advice or under a wrong impression that if a complaint is lodged under section 498-A IPC, the husband may come to terms, complaints are being lodged with the police. It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them. Andhra High Court Tahmeena Kaleem And … Continue reading It is most unfortunate that Section 498-A IPC has become a weapon in breaking the families rather than in uniting them.
sarvepalli legal 