Excerpt: Bombay High Court Video Master vs Nishi Productions on 21 October, 1997 Author: A Sakhare Bench: A Sakhare ORDER A.Y. Sakhare, J. 1. By this motion, plaintiffs are praying for various reliefs in respect of cinematography film "BEES SAAL BAAD". 2. Plaintiffs have filed this suit for declaration that plaintiff No. I has sole … Continue reading Video Master vs Nishi Productions
M/S. Entertainment Network … vs M/S. Super Cassettee Industries
Excerpt: Supreme Court of India M/S. Entertainment Network ... vs M/S. Super Cassettee Industries ... on 16 May, 2008 Author: S Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5114 OF 2005 M/s Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. ... Appellant Versus M/s Super Cassette … Continue reading M/S. Entertainment Network … vs M/S. Super Cassettee Industries
Video Master vs Nishi Productions
Excerpt: Bombay High Court Video Master vs Nishi Productions on 21 October, 1997 Author: A Sakhare Bench: A Sakhare ORDER A.Y. Sakhare, J. 1. By this motion, plaintiffs are praying for various reliefs in respect of cinematography film "BEES SAAL BAAD". 2. Plaintiffs have filed this suit for declaration that plaintiff No. I has sole … Continue reading Video Master vs Nishi Productions
Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd vs Indian Performing Rights Society
Excerpt: The definition of quia timet, borrowed from Black's, means a legal doctrine that allows a person to seek equitable relief from future probable harm to a specific right or interest. Therefore, such equitable relief can be granted to a person, provided he can successfully demonstrate before a Court that his fears in this regard … Continue reading Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd vs Indian Performing Rights Society
Fortune Films International vs Dev Anand And Anr
Excerpt: Bombay High Court Fortune Films International vs Dev Anand And Anr. on 14 March, 1978 Equivalent citations: AIR 1979 Bom 17, (1978) 80 BOMLR 263 Author: Desai Bench: Kantawala, Desai JUDGMENT Desai, J. 1. This appeal is from the order of Gadgil J. dated 3rd January 1978 made on the plaintiff's Notice of Motion, … Continue reading Fortune Films International vs Dev Anand And Anr
Jagdish Prasad Gupta vs Parmeshwar Prasad Singh And Ors
Excerpt: Patna High Court Jagdish Prasad Gupta vs Parmeshwar Prasad Singh And Ors. on 30 March, 1965 Equivalent citations: AIR 1966 Pat 33, 1966 CriLJ 54 Author: T Nath Bench: T Nath ORDER Tarkeshwar Nath, J. 1. These are three applications directed against separate orders dated 1-6-1963 passed by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sadar Patna, dismissing … Continue reading Jagdish Prasad Gupta vs Parmeshwar Prasad Singh And Ors
writings of a religious preacher, , or his sermons and sayings which are compiled on his behalf would prima facie, come within the meaning of ‘literary works’ and would in my view, be protected under the Copyright Act.
Excerpt:writings of a religious preacher, , or his sermons and sayings which are compiled by Satasang on his behalf would prima facie, come within the meaning of 'literary works' and would in my view, be protected under the Copyright Act. Calcutta High Court Satsang And Anr. vs Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhyay And ... on 18 July, … Continue reading writings of a religious preacher, , or his sermons and sayings which are compiled on his behalf would prima facie, come within the meaning of ‘literary works’ and would in my view, be protected under the Copyright Act.
sarvepalli legal 