Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started
Skip to content

sarvepalli legal

Dharma wins

  • welcome
  • constitutional law
  • Muslim Law
  • Hindu Succession Laws
  • Anticipatory Bail
  • Right to information
  • Taxation laws
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • NDPS Act
  • Indian Contract act
  • labour law
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • contact us
  • NI ACT

Section 2(c ) of ICA

Who is a Promisee and a Promisor

Posted on June 30, 2020June 30, 2020 by sarvepallilegal

The person making the proposal is called the “promisor”, and the person accepting the proposal is called the “promisee”;

Posted in Indian Contract actTagged Section 2(c ) of ICALeave a comment
Follow sarvepalli legal on WordPress.com

Categories

  • 498a
  • Anticipatory Bail
  • constitutional law
  • CPC
  • CrPC
  • Hindu Succession Laws
  • Indian Contract act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • labour law
  • Land Laws
  • law of torts
  • Muslim Law
  • NDPS Act
  • NI ACT
  • principle of natural justice
  • Right to information
  • Sc st atrocity act
  • Taxation laws
  • tort of defamation .
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Dipali Biswas . vs Nirmalendu Mukherjee
  • Rahul S Shah vs Jinendrakumar Gandhi
  • Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam vs The State Of Bihar
  • K. Suryanarayana, A2 vs N. Jyothi
  • (no title)

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

sarvepallilegal

sarvepallilegal

Doctrine of Aul

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S3h0HrsQuQ&t=49s

Injuria sine damnum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHEbMxeaQs&t=127s

mynation.net

  • RSS - Posts

RSS Shades of Knife

  • Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Nath Sahu and Ors Vs Gobardhan Sao and Ors on 27 Feb 2002
  • Nimesh Dilipbhai Brahmbhatt Vs Hitesh Jayantilal Patel on 02 May 2022
  • Indian Oil Corporation Ltd and Ors Vs Subrata Borah Chowlek and Anr on 12 Nov 2010
  • State of Maharashtra Vs Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede on 29 Jul 2009
  • Sabiya Begum Malka Vs State of U.P. and Ors on 18 May 2016

Recent Posts: Defamation

Shybimon vs Haridas

M.K.Varghese Cor Episcopa vs State Of Kerala

Cause of action is date of offence not date of acquittal

Exceptions to defamation are a matter of trial

Mohammed Abdulla Khan vs Prakash K

Recent Posts: Fight against Legal Terrorism

( No Title )

( No Title )

( No Title )

( No Title )

Unless the dying declaration is wholly reliable, voluntarily free from all doubts and truthful and further the maker was in fit medical condition, it can not be the basis for conviction. 

Website Powered by WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • sarvepalli legal
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • sarvepalli legal
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar