Excerpt:the price paid for the sale is inadequate and that the sale effected by the plaintiff's father in favour of defendant 1 is not justified on the ground that it was beneficial to the family estate. If that be so, then the sale deed would not be binding on the plaintiff to the extent of … Continue reading when the price paid for sale is inadequate and not for the benefit of family estate, then the sale deed is not binding on the heirs.
A ‘step-son’ is not entitled as ‘son’ to inherit, to his stepmother as one of the heirs under this Entry. But he can succeed to her property as an heir of her husband under Entry (b)”.
Excerpt: Karnataka High Court Mallappa Fakirappa Sanna ... vs Shivappa And Anr. on 4 December, 1961 Equivalent citations: AIR 1962 Kant 140, AIR 1962 Mys 140 Author: Sadasivayya Bench: M Sadasivayya, A A Khan JUDGMENT Sadasivayya, J. (1) This Regular Appeal is against the judgment and decree in Special Civil Suit No. 41/54 on the … Continue reading A ‘step-son’ is not entitled as ‘son’ to inherit, to his stepmother as one of the heirs under this Entry. But he can succeed to her property as an heir of her husband under Entry (b)”.
when the Legislature has chosen to use the word ‘used’ we have to give a full meaning to it.If the machinery is not used, Section 32 is not applicable and hence, the assessee cannot have any benefits,
Excerpt:when the Legislature has chosen to use the word 'used' we have to give a full meaning to it and avoid reading something not intended by the Legislation. Afterall, these benefits are provided for certain purposes. That purpose is used in terms of the Statute. If the machinery is not used, Section 32 is not applicable and … Continue reading when the Legislature has chosen to use the word ‘used’ we have to give a full meaning to it.If the machinery is not used, Section 32 is not applicable and hence, the assessee cannot have any benefits,
A. Basavaraj And Another vs Kushal Chand And Another
Excerpt: In a case where the Court finds that the alienation made by a manager or Kartha of a Hindu family is supported by legal necessity, but it is otherwise required to be set aside or declared as not binding upon the shares of the non-alienating coparceners, the consideration amount paid by the purchaser proportionate … Continue reading A. Basavaraj And Another vs Kushal Chand And Another
In a family, consisting of the mother and her minor children, the mother can act as manager of the joint family properties, has the same rights as the ‘karta’ under the Common (Hindu) Law to bring about alienation of the joint family properties, including the share of the minors for legal necessity or for the benefit of the estate.
Excerpt:in a family, consisting of the mother and her minor children, the mother can act as Managthe mother, as manager of the joint family properties, has the same rights as the 'karta' under the Common (Hindu) Law to bring about alienation of the joint family properties, including the share of the minors for legal necessity … Continue reading In a family, consisting of the mother and her minor children, the mother can act as manager of the joint family properties, has the same rights as the ‘karta’ under the Common (Hindu) Law to bring about alienation of the joint family properties, including the share of the minors for legal necessity or for the benefit of the estate.
sarvepalli legal 