Bombay High Court Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... vs D.R. Phatak on 6 August, 1974 Equivalent citations: 1975 99 ITR 14 Bom Author: Kantawala Bench: R Kantawala, V Tulzapurkar JUDGMENT Kantawala, C.J. 1. This reference relates to a claim for exemption or deduction of the amount received by a Government servant for compensatory (city) allowance. … Continue reading Commissioner Of Income-Tax, … vs D.R. Phatak
Abdul Satar Suleman Haji Ahmed vs The Advocate General Of Bombay
Excerpt: a power of revocation in favour of the settlor contained in a deed of wakf renders the deed void. Bombay High Court Abdul Satar Suleman Haji Ahmed vs The Advocate General Of Bombay on 22 September, 1932 Equivalent citations: (1933) 35 BOMLR 18 Author: J Beaumont Bench: J Beaumont, Kt., Blackwell JUDGMENT John Beaumont, … Continue reading Abdul Satar Suleman Haji Ahmed vs The Advocate General Of Bombay
Video Master vs Nishi Productions
Excerpt: Bombay High Court Video Master vs Nishi Productions on 21 October, 1997 Author: A Sakhare Bench: A Sakhare ORDER A.Y. Sakhare, J. 1. By this motion, plaintiffs are praying for various reliefs in respect of cinematography film "BEES SAAL BAAD". 2. Plaintiffs have filed this suit for declaration that plaintiff No. I has sole … Continue reading Video Master vs Nishi Productions
Video Master vs Nishi Productions
Excerpt: Bombay High Court Video Master vs Nishi Productions on 21 October, 1997 Author: A Sakhare Bench: A Sakhare ORDER A.Y. Sakhare, J. 1. By this motion, plaintiffs are praying for various reliefs in respect of cinematography film "BEES SAAL BAAD". 2. Plaintiffs have filed this suit for declaration that plaintiff No. I has sole … Continue reading Video Master vs Nishi Productions
The exploitation of the film must be through the media of video exploitation only and no other media and method of exploitation. T.V. rights and video rights are totally different categories and not improved version of the rights.
Excerpt: video rights covers in itself exploitation of the film through the media of video, VHS tapes, VCD's or DVD's or any other advanced version of tape but the exploitation of the film must be through the media of video exploitation only and no other media and method of exploitation. T.V. rights and video rights … Continue reading The exploitation of the film must be through the media of video exploitation only and no other media and method of exploitation. T.V. rights and video rights are totally different categories and not improved version of the rights.
Ramlanshan Jageshar vs Bombay Gas Co. Ltd
Excerpt: Manufacturing process" is defined in1 Clause (k) of Section 2 as meaning "any process for (1) making, altering, repairing, ornamenting, finishing, packing, oiling, washing, cleaning, breaking up, demolishing, or otherwise treating or adapting any article or substance with a view to its use, sale, transport, delivery or disposal". Bombay High Court Ramlanshan Jageshar vs Bombay Gas … Continue reading Ramlanshan Jageshar vs Bombay Gas Co. Ltd
Fortune Films International vs Dev Anand And Anr
Excerpt: Bombay High Court Fortune Films International vs Dev Anand And Anr. on 14 March, 1978 Equivalent citations: AIR 1979 Bom 17, (1978) 80 BOMLR 263 Author: Desai Bench: Kantawala, Desai JUDGMENT Desai, J. 1. This appeal is from the order of Gadgil J. dated 3rd January 1978 made on the plaintiff's Notice of Motion, … Continue reading Fortune Films International vs Dev Anand And Anr
every republication of a libel is a new libel and each publisher is answerable for his act to the same extent as if the calumny originates with him. T
Excerpt: every republication of a libel is a new libel and each publisher is answerable for his act to the same extent as if the calumny originates with him. The maker of a film will be answerable for his act even though the film is based on a play and no action is taken against … Continue reading every republication of a libel is a new libel and each publisher is answerable for his act to the same extent as if the calumny originates with him. T
Garware Plastics And Polyester … vs Telelink And Ors
Excerpt: In a given case, whether in respect of a particular film, the copyright to show the film on Cable T.V. network has been assigned by the owner of the copyright to anybody else or not, will depend upon the nature of the agreement which is arrived at. If there is no agreement assigning such … Continue reading Garware Plastics And Polyester … vs Telelink And Ors
It is a settled principle of law relating to trademark that there can be only one mark, one source, and one proprietor. It cannot have two origins.Even then, the joint proprietors must use the trademark jointly for the benefit of all
Excerpt: The respondents cannot exploit the copyright singly or individually. The exploitation of the copyright must be jointly made by the petitioner and respondents as they are the joint owner. It is a settled principle of law relating to trademark that there can be only one mark, one source, and one proprietor. It cannot have … Continue reading It is a settled principle of law relating to trademark that there can be only one mark, one source, and one proprietor. It cannot have two origins.Even then, the joint proprietors must use the trademark jointly for the benefit of all
sarvepalli legal 